[ /bananas/ / /boku/ / /dawa/ / /desu/ / /jum/ / /kashira/ / /md/ / /otousama/ / /ro/ / /unyuu/ / /yakult/ ] [ /a/ / /c/ / /h/ / /loli/ / /moonspeak/ / /nagato/ / /nij/ / /nipa/ / /touhou/ / /tr/ / /vn/ / /yan/ ] [ /do/ / /fi/ / /lit/ / /o/ / /pro/ / /tech/ / /tg/ / /v/ / /vic/ ] [ /arrrrr/ / /gar/ / /gif/ / /media/ / /ot/ / /r/ / /w/ ] [ /donate/ / /mod/ / /sandbox/ / /sugg/ ]
These are my new shoes :DI might take an actual photo of my shoes in a couple of days and post it if I feel like it (I don't have them with me).Do you like them, /vic/?
These are my new shoes :D
I might take an actual photo of my shoes in a couple of days and post it if I feel like it (I don't have them with me).
Do you like them, /vic/?
<3
>>673:3And you know how awesome they look on me with my striped stockings :D
>>673
:3
And you know how awesome they look on me with my striped stockings :D
Pic goes in shoe thread! Did they come with all of those bows or just the red ones?
>>676All of them. Black, pink, and red. I don't wear them with the bows, though. Derp I forgot to take my camera home with me on the weekend (My shoes aren't with me now), so I'll to get one this weekend.
>>676
All of them. Black, pink, and red. I don't wear them with the bows, though.
Derp I forgot to take my camera home with me on the weekend (My shoes aren't with me now), so I'll to get one this weekend.
>>669 Awesome shoes, they're so awesome!
What did guys wear back then?
I recommend watching horror movies starring vincent price.Some amazing outfits I dont know what era theyre from though.
I recommend watching horror movies starring vincent price.
Some amazing outfits I dont know what era theyre from though.
>>1797
>>1797Regency. Early 1800s, (Like pictured) when a gent would look back fondly on the ruffly doings of the late 1700s, which this >>1800 is.I remember looking at presidential portraits and noticing the years their neck-wear changes.>>1798>>1799This is more Shakespearean period. Hard to believe people wore those coffee filter things around their necks
>>1797Regency. Early 1800s, (Like pictured) when a gent would look back fondly on the ruffly doings of the late 1700s, which this >>1800 is.I remember looking at presidential portraits and noticing the years their neck-wear changes.
>>1798>>1799This is more Shakespearean period. Hard to believe people wore those coffee filter things around their necks
pictures of girls(or boys!) living the dream.
Can't have a fancy crib without your own wine cellar.
could we have a thread about vanity items?
Natural Kei lolita seems ideal for a more mature look.
>>1821this is the gothic lolita board. There is no other. How is that so hard to understand?
>>1822It's the "Gothic Lolita and" board.>Doesn't "a more mature look" kind of defeat the purpose?>Neither gothic nor lolita.Apart from how this is wrong, being neither gothic nor lolita doesn't defeat any purpose since this board is not restricted to gothic lolita.How is that so hard to understand?
>>1822It's the "Gothic Lolita and" board.
>Doesn't "a more mature look" kind of defeat the purpose?>Neither gothic nor lolita.
Apart from how this is wrong, being neither gothic nor lolita doesn't defeat any purpose since this board is not restricted to gothic lolita.
How is that so hard to understand?
>>1687This is great.
I'm kinda surprised that Desuchan still exists, and pretty pleased about it. Classic Lolita was my thing for a while but I'm definitely getting more into Mori. There can certainly be overlap between the two styles.
>>1823yeah this. its very obviously all things victorian style or inspired by it.
Beautiful
She is too old to be a Lolita!
Is it ok to show a young Lolita nude? (NO) Last edited by moderator 20/02/28(Fri)10:54.
Is it ok to show a young Lolita nude?
(NO)
Last edited by moderator 20/02/28(Fri)10:54.
Victorian fashion drawings
Is Rococo FINE TOO?
Is Rococo
FINE
TOO?
- wakarimasen beta + futaba + futallaby -